Adelman, James S., Zachary Estes & Martina Cossu. 2018. Emotional sound symbolism: Languages rapidly signal valence via phonemes. Cognition 175. 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.007.Search in Google Scholar

Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlatev. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38(1/4). 298–348. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2010.38.1-4.11.Search in Google Scholar

Akita, Kimi & Mark Dingemanse. 2019. Ideophones (mimetics, expressives). In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.477Search in Google Scholar

Annear, Lucas. 2020. Vowel category and meanings of size in Tolkien’s early lexicons. Journal of Tolkien Research 9(2). Article 5. https://scholar.valpo.edu/journaloftolkienresearch/vol9/iss2/5 (accessed 5 October 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Auracher, Jan, Winfried Menninghaus & Mathias Scharinger. 2020. Sound predicts meaning: Cross‐modal associations between formant frequency and emotional tone in stanzas. Cognitive Science 44(10). e12906. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12906.Search in Google Scholar

Aveyard, Mark E. 2012. Some consonants sound curvy: Effects of sound symbolism on object recognition. Memory & Cognition 40(1). 83–92. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0139-3.Search in Google Scholar

Barton, David N. & Jamin Halberstadt. 2018. A social Bouba/Kiki effect: A bias for people whose names match their faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25. 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1304-x.Search in Google Scholar

Bentley, Madison & Edith J. Varon. 1933. An accessory study of “phonetic symbolism”. The American Journal of Psychology 45(1). 76–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/1414187.Search in Google Scholar

Blasi, Damián E., Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen. 2016. Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 113(39). 10818–10823. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605782113.Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1949. The sign is not arbitrary. Thesaurus 1(1). 52–62.Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1961. Generality, gradience, and the all-or-none. in Janua linguarum, studia memoriae Nicolai van Wijk dedicata edenda curat Cornelis H, van Schooneveld. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Casasanto, Daniel, Kyle Jasmin, Geoffrey Brookshire & Tom, Gijssels. 2014. The QWERTY Effect: How typing shapes word meanings and baby names. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 36(36). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2573p1tf (accessed 4 October 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Childs, G. Tucker. 2015. Sound symbolism. In John R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 284–302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.030Search in Google Scholar

Costa, Paul T. & Robert R. McCrae. 1988. Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(5). 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.853.Search in Google Scholar

De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale (publié par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye). Lausanne: Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2013. Ideophones and gesture in everyday speech. Gesture 13(2). 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.2.02din.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2015. Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language 39(4). 946–970. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.4.05din.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2018. Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.444.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53(3). 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222671600030x.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, GaryLupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(10). 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Will Schuerman, Eva Reinisch, Sylvia Tufvesson & Holger Mitterer. 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language 92(2). e117–e133. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0034.Search in Google Scholar

Duan, Yucai. 1815. 说文解字注 [Annotations of words and characters] (经韵楼刻本 Jingyunlou Keben). Shanghai: 上海古籍出版社 Shanghai Classics Publication House. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&res=81427&remap=gb (accessed 30 September 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Fimi, Dimitra. 2008. Tolkien, race and cultural history: From fairies to Hobbits. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Semblance and signification, 55–81. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ill.10.04fisSearch in Google Scholar

Fónagy, Ivan. 1999. Why iconicity? In Max Nänny & Olga Fischer (eds.), Form miming meaning: Iconicity in language and literature. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ill.1.06fonSearch in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.3Search in Google Scholar

Godoy, Mahayana C., André Lucas Gomes, Gakuji Kumagai & Shigeto Kawahara. 2021. Sound symbolism in Brazilian Portuguese Pokémon names: Evidence for cross-linguistic similarities and differences. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 20(1). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.257.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Lewis R. 1981. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Ladd Wheeler (ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, vol. 2, 141–165. Beverly Hills: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Zhengkun. 1995. 人类语言音义同构现象与人类文化模式 [Structural identicalness between sound and meaning of languages in connection with patterns of human cultures]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版) Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 32(6). 87–95.Search in Google Scholar

Gymnich, Marion. 2005. Reconsidering the linguistics of middle-earth: Invented languages and other linguistic features in J.R.R. Tolkien’s the Lord of the Rings. In Thomas Honegger (ed.), Reconsidering Tolkien, 7–30. Zurich: Walking Tree Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4). 781–819. https://doi.org/10.2307/413373.Search in Google Scholar

Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.). 1994. Sound symbolism. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806Search in Google Scholar

Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2021. When gesture “takes over”: Speech-embedded nonverbal depictions in multimodal interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 552533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552533.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Zhuanglin. 2011. Imagic iconicity in the Chinese language. In Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Semblance and signification (Iconicity in language and literature), 83–99. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ill.10.05huSearch in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2004. Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3). 317–349.10.1515/cogl.2004.012Search in Google Scholar

Imai, Mutsumi & Sotaro Kita. 2014. The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1651). 20130298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, Niklas Erben, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & ArthurHolmer. 2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24(2). 253–310. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2034.Search in Google Scholar

Kajitani, Motomi. 2005. Semantic properties of reduplication among the world’s languages. In Rebecca Shields (ed.), LSO working papers in linguistics volume 5: Proceedings of WIGL 2005, 93–106. https://langsci.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1012/2019/01/08-Kajitani.pdf (accessed 20 October 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Kasof, Joseph. 1993. Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Psychological Bulletin 113(1). 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.140.Search in Google Scholar

Kawahara, Shigeto & Gakuji Kumagai. 2019. Expressing evolution in Pokémon names: Experimental explorations. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 35(1). 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2019-2002.Search in Google Scholar

Kawahara, Shigeto, Atsushi Noto & Gakuji Kumagai. 2018. Sound symbolic patterns in Pokémon names. Phonetica 75(3). 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484938.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Kong-On. 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 13(1). 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700005211.Search in Google Scholar

Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35(2). 379–415. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379.Search in Google Scholar

Klink, Richard R. 2000. Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters 11(1). 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008184423824.10.1023/A:1008184423824Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, Wolfgang. 1929. Gestalt psychology. New York: H. Liveright.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy J. 1994. An experimental investigation into phonetic symbolism as it relates to Mandarin Chinese. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 130–147. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806.010Search in Google Scholar

Li, Haixia. 2002. 汉语动物命名研究 [Research on animal-naming in Chinese]. Chengdu: 巴蜀书社 Bashu Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Shizhong. 1987. 谈汉语声调对词义的象征性 [Talking about the symbolism of Chinese tones on the meaning of words]. 光明日报 Guangming Daily 14 April. 3.Search in Google Scholar

Lǐ, Yuèyuán & Dan Ponsford. 2018. Predicative reduplication: Functions, their relationships and iconicities. Linguistic Typology 22(1). 51–117.10.1515/lingty-2018-0003Search in Google Scholar

Lieberson, Stanley & Eleanor O. Bell. 1992. Children’s first names: An empirical study of social taste. American Journal of Sociology 98(3). 511–554. https://doi.org/10.1086/230048.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007. The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Danqing & Yujie Chen. 2008. 汉语指示词语音象似性的跨方言考察 [Studies in the phonetic iconicity of Chinese demonstratives across dialects]. 当代语言学 Contemporary Linguistics 10(4). 289–297.Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, Max & Zhan Qu. 2017. Estimating valence from the sound of a word: Computational, experimental, and cross-linguistic evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24(3). 849–855. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1142-2.Search in Google Scholar

Macrae, C. Neil, Jason P. Mitchell & Louise F. Pendry. 2002. What’s in a forename? Cue familiarity and stereotypical thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38(2). 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1496.Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa, Seán G. Roberts, Ludy Cilissen, Karen Emmorey, Brenda Nicodemus, Lucinda O’Grady, Bencie Woll, Barbara Lelan, Hilário de Sousa, Brian L. Cansler, Shakila Shayan, Connie de Vos, Gunter Senft, N. J. Enfield, Rogayah A. Razak, Sebastian Fedden, Sylvia Tufvesson, Mark Dingemanse, Ozge Ozturk, Penelope Brown, Clair Hill, Olivier Le Guen, Vincent Hirtzel, Rik van Gijn, Mark A. Sicoli & Stephen C. Levinson. 2018. Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 115(45). 11369–11376. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720419115.Search in Google Scholar

Mattes, Veronika. 2017. Iconicity in the lexicon: The semantic categories of lexical reduplication. Studies in Language 41(4). 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16024.mat.Search in Google Scholar

Meng, Chenxi. 2012. A description of ideophonic words in Mandarin Chinese. Leiden: Leiden University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Mok, Waiching Enid. 2001. Chinese sound symbolism: A phonological perspective. Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Moravscik, Edith A. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, Volume 3: Word structure, 297–334. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Newman, Stanley S. 1933. Further Experiments in phonetic symbolism. The American Journal of Psychology 45(1). 53–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1414186.Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, Alan KS & Mark Dingemanse. 2021. Iconicity in word learning and beyond: A critical review. Language and Speech 64(1). 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920914339.Search in Google Scholar

Nuckolls, Janis B. 1996. Sounds like life: Sound-symbolic grammar, performance, and cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Occhino, Corrine. 2017. An introduction to embodied cognitive phonology: Claw-5 hand-shape distribution in ASL and Libras. Complutense Journal of English Studies 25. 69–103. https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.57198.Search in Google Scholar

Occhino, Corrine, BenjaminAnible & Jill P. Morford. 2020. The role of iconicity, construal, and proficiency in the online processing of handshape. Language and Cognition 12(1). 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.1.Search in Google Scholar

Pathak, Abhishek, Gemma Anne Calvert & Lewis K. S. Lim. 2020. Harsh voices, sound branding: How voiced consonants in a brand’s name can alter its perceived attributes. Psychology & Marketing 37(6). 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21346.Search in Google Scholar

Pathak, Abhishek, Carlos Velasco & Charles Spence. 2020. The sound of branding: An analysis of the initial phonemes of popular brand names. Journal of Brand Management 27. 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-019-00183-5.Search in Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & GabriellaVigliocco. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1. Article 227. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227/full (accessed 5 October 2021).10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227Search in Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1651). 20130300. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0300.Search in Google Scholar

Pitcher, Benjamin J., Alex Mesoudi & Alan G. McElligott. 2013. Sex-Biased sound symbolism in English-language first names. PLOS ONE 8(6). e64825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064825.Search in Google Scholar

Pogacar, Ruth, Agnes Pisanski Peterlin, Nike K. Pokorn & Timothy Pogačar. 2017. Sound symbolism in translation: A case study of character names in Charles Dickens’s Oliver Twist. Translation and Interpreting Studies 12(1). 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.12.1.07pog.Search in Google Scholar

Ramachandran, Vilayanur Subramanian & Edward M. Hubbard. 2001. Synaesthesia - a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(12). 3–34.Search in Google Scholar

Rausch, Roman. 2013. Sound symbolism in Elvish. In Anders Stenström (ed.), Arda philology 4: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on J.R.R. Tolkien’s invented languages, Omentielva Cantea, Valencia, 11-14 August 2011, 82–119. Arda Society.Search in Google Scholar

Regier, Terry. 1994. A preliminary study of the semantics of reduplication. California: International Computer Science Institute. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/ftp/global/pub/techreports/1994/tr-94-019.pdf (accessed 27 May 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Roque, Lila San, Kobin H. Kendrick, Elisabeth Norcliffe, Penelope Brown, Rebecca Defina, Mark Dingemanse, Tyko Dirksmeyer, N. J. Enfield, Simeon Floyd, Jeremy Hammond, Giovanni Rossi, Sylvia Tufvesson, Saskia van Putten & Asifa Majid. 2015. Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1). 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0089.Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12(3). 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070931.10.1037/h0070931Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, David. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482649Search in Google Scholar

Sidhu, David M. & Penny M. Pexman. 2015. What’s in a name? Sound symbolism and gender in first names. PLOS ONE 10(5). e0126809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126809.Search in Google Scholar

Sidhu, David M. & Penny M. Pexman. 2019. The sound symbolism of names. Current Directions in Psychological Science 28(4). 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419850134.Search in Google Scholar

Sidhu, David M., Penny M. Pexman & Jean Saint-Aubin. 2016. From the Bob/Kirk effect to the Benoit/Éric effect: Testing the mechanism of name sound symbolism in two languages. Acta Psychologica 169. 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.011.Search in Google Scholar

Sidhu, David M., Penny M. Pexman & Jean Saint-Aubin. 2019. Is un stylo sharper than une épée? Investigating the interaction of sound symbolism and grammatical gender in English and French speakers. PLOS ONE 14(12). e0225623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225623.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan. 2015. Sound symbolism in the reduplicative vocabulary of the Shijing. The Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture 2(2). 258–285. https://doi.org/10.1215/23290048-3324236.Search in Google Scholar

Speed, Laura J. & Asifa Majid. 2019. Grounding language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell. Cognitive Neuropsychology 37(5–6). 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1623188.Search in Google Scholar

Spence, Charles. 2012. Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(1). 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

Spence, Charles & Alberto Gallace. 2011. Tasting shapes and words. Food Quality and Preference 22(3). 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 2017. Sound symbolism: The role of word sound in meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 8(5). e1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1441.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Insup Kim & Maurice M. Taylor. 1962. Phonetic symbolism in four unrelated languages. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 16(4). 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083261.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Arthur Lewis. 2018. Are tones in the expressive lexicon iconic? Evidence from three Chinese languages. PLOS ONE 13(12). e0204270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204270.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Robin L., David P. Vinson & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2009. The link between form and meaning in American sign language: Lexical processing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35(2). 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014547.Search in Google Scholar

Tsur, Reuven. 2006. Size–sound symbolism revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 38(6). 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

Uno, Ryoko, Kazuko Shinohara, Yuta Hosokawa, Naho Atsumi, Gakuji Kumagai & Shigeto Kawahara. 2020. What’s in a villain’s name? Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). 428–457. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00066.uno.Search in Google Scholar

Urban, Matthias. 2011. Conventional sound symbolism in terms for organs of speech: A cross-linguistic study. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2011.007.Search in Google Scholar

Valentine, Tim, Tim Brennen & Serge Bredart. 1996. The cognitive psychology of proper names. London/New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203285763Search in Google Scholar

Van de Weijer, Jeroen, Guangyuan Ren, Joost van de Weijer, Weiyun Wei & Yumeng Wang. 2019. Gender identification in Chinese names. Lingua 234. 102759.10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102759Search in Google Scholar

Van Hoey, Thomas. 2020. Prototypicality and salience in Chinese ideophones: A cognitive and corpus linguistics approach 中文擬聲(態)詞的原型與顯著特徵:以認知與語料庫語言學方法探討. Taipei: National Taiwan University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Vinson, David P., Kearsy Cormier, Tanya Denmark, AdamSchembri & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2008. The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity. Behavior Research Methods 40(4). 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.4.1079.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Peter & Caroline Regina Parameswaran. 2019. Cross-sensory correspondences in language: Vowel sounds can symbolize the felt heaviness of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 45(2). 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000583.Search in Google Scholar

Wan, Xiaoang, Andy T. Woods, Jasper J. F. van den Bosch, Kirsten J. McKenzie, Carlos Velasco & Charles Spence. 2014. Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features. Frontiers in Psychology 5. 1365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01365.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Yin. 2006. 荀子论语言的体验性认知辩证观 [Embodied, cognitive and dialectical view of language by Xunzi]. 外语学刊 Foreign Language Research 5. 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Whitney, William Dwight. 1891 [1867]. Language and the study of language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science, 5th edn. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.10.1017/CBO9781139856256Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 2004. Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed language. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.005.Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo. 2016. Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31(8). 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1193619.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, Jock. 2003. The reduplication of Chinese names in Singapore English. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Search in Google Scholar

Wong, Kristen Wing Yan & Yoonjung Kang. 2019. Sound symbolism of gender in Cantonese first names. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of phonetic sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (Proceedings of ICPhS), 2129–2133. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Guozhang. 1988. 语言符号的任意性问题 [Problems of arbitrariness in linguistic signs]. 外语教学与研究 Foreign Language Teaching and Research(3). 2–10.Search in Google Scholar

Yasuda, Kiyoshi, Bobbie Beckmann & Tetsuo Nakamura. 2000. Brain processing of proper names. Aphasiology 14(11). 1067–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030050174638.Search in Google Scholar

Ying, Xuefeng. 2009. 现代汉语单音节反义词音义象似性考察 [A study on iconicity between sounds and meanings of monosyllabic antonyms in modern Chinese]. 语言教学与研究 Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (3). 21–27.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lichang. 2011. 汉语普通话单音动词声调理据研究 [On tones of Mandarin Chinese monophonic verbs]. 杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版) Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University (Social Sciences) 7(4). 40–45.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lichang. 2014. 声调意义的疆域——汉语普通话单音名词声调理据研 [The realm of the tones - a data based study on the semantic distribution in the four tones in Mandarin Chinese monosyllabic words]. 齐鲁学刊 Qilu Journal 1. 155–160.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, Lihua. 1989. 语音象征意义初探 [A preliminary study on sound symbolism]. 现代外语 Modern Foreign Languages 12(1). 55–59.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Youbin. 2012. 叠音人名的考察与分析 [The investigation and analysis of reduplicated words in people’s names]. 语言文字应用 Applied Linguistics 4. 48–55.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Xianchao. 2003. A preliminary study of sound symbolism in the modern Chinese language 现代汉语中声音意义的初探. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Xiaonong. 2004. 亲密与高调——对小称调、女国音、美眉等语言现象的生物学解释 [Intimacy and high pitch]. 当代语言学 Contemporary Linguistics 6(3). 193–222.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Yongsheng. 2002. 论语言符号的任意性与象似性 [On the arbitrariness and iconicity of linguistic signs]. 外语教学与研究 Foreign Language Teaching and Research 34(1). 2–7.Search in Google Scholar

Zipf, George Kingsley. 1935. The psychobiology of language. New York: Hougton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting, general session and parasession on grammar and cognition, 330–340. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v13i0.1817Search in Google Scholar